Archivieren
Ehe, Scheidung und Ehevertrag
Ein Top-Anwalt beantwortet alle Ihre drängenden Fragen, und noch mehr.
Wenige Tage nach Weihnachten und einen Monat vor dem Valentinstag klingeln die Hotlines der Familienanwaltskanzleien unglückliche Paare schreiend "Ich will raus!"
Promi-Power-Paare, die einst der Inbegriff von Hochzeitsglück waren und märchenhafte Romantik are an upsetting attestation to the truth that when it comes to marriage, no couple is guaranteed to live happily ever after — from Heidi Klum and Seal who shared 6 years of marriage but annually made vow renewals, to Juanita Vanoy and Michael Jordan who spent 17 years of marriage and got reconciled on their first divorce filing, to Phyllis Raphael and Sumner Redstone who spent 52 years of marriage up to their senior years before announcing split.
Fact: There is a 62% rate of divorce in the US. Most of these divorces are filed in January.
What’s worse, divorce is not just painful but is also a costly process, especially for the one with the most money earned. While in most cases the woman gets away with the pricey divorce settlement (Juanita received $168 million from Michael Jordan), there were also cases when the woman (apparently more financially successful than her partner) has to shoulder the cost.
Britney Spears was ordered to shed $40,000 a month to her ex-husband Kevin Federline (whose occupation was listed as pizza delivery boy and dancer at the time of their marriage), Elizabeth Taylor paid $1 million to her 8th Ehemann Larry Fortensky (ein Bauarbeiter), Jennifer Lopez zahlte 14 Millionen Dollar an Chris Judd (ihren ehemaligen Ersatztänzer und Choreografen), Rosanne Barr (die ihren Anwalt entließ, weil er vorschlug, eine Ehe einzugehen) zahlte ihrem komischen Ehemann Tom Arnold 50 Millionen Dollar und Madonna schüttete einen Pauschalbetrag von 76 bis 92 Millionen US-Dollar an Guy Ritchie aus.
Heutzutage können Karrierefrauen im Scheidungsverfahren sowohl emotionalen als auch finanziellen Schaden erleiden. Daher ist es an der Zeit, dass wir uns vor der Heirat rechtlich auf die Scheidung vorbereiten. Ivana Trump rät, wenn es um diesen Prozess geht, „Sei nicht böse, hol dir alles.“
Urbanette Magazine setzte sich mit Atty zusammen. Michael Kelly, einer der besten Familienrechtsanwälte des Landes, um über Ehe, Scheidung und Eheverträge zu sprechen.
Hier sind interessante Fakten, die wir entdeckt haben:
- Am besten heiraten Sie in Kalifornien und Texas.
- Januar ist die Zeit der Scheidung.
- Hormone beeinflussen die Schwangerschaft vor der Paarungszeit. Ernsthaft.
Urbanette Zeitschrift: Zweiundvierzig Jahre Erfahrung im Scheidungs- und Familienrecht – wow! Welche Bundesstaaten eignen sich Ihrer Meinung nach am besten und am schlechtesten zum Heiraten?
Atty. Michael Kelly: Kalifornien ist der beste Staat zum Heiraten, weil es sein Bestes getan hat, um gleiche Wettbewerbsbedingungen zu schaffen und sicherzustellen, dass Ehepartner die gleichen Chancen haben, einen Scheidungsanwalt zu bekommen. Texas gehört möglicherweise auch zu den Besten, weil dort Geschworenenprozesse bei Scheidungen möglich sind, die dem Richter alle Macht entziehen. In Kalifornien hat jedoch der Richter die volle Macht und keine Jury. Arkansas, Georgia und Oregon gehören zu den schlimmsten. Ihre Gesetzgebungsbilanz liegt weit hinter der anderer Staaten.
Urbanette:Wie sind die Gesetze Gibt es in Kalifornien in Bezug auf Scheidung und Eheschließung anders als in anderen US-Bundesstaaten?
Atty. Kelly: Der Fall Barry Bonds fand in Kalifornien statt, wo die Frau von Herrn Bonds einen Ehevertrag unterzeichnete, um auf dem Weg nach Las Vegas in einen Privatjet zu steigen. Der Fall Bonds wurde vom Obersten Gerichtshof Kaliforniens als akzeptabler Ehevertrag eingestuft. Als Reaktion auf dieses Urteil legte der Gesetzgeber daraufhin bestimmte gesetzliche Regelungen fest, die eine siebentägige Bedenkzeit vorsehen, bevor eine voreheliche Ehe in Kraft tritt, sowie die gesetzliche Anordnung der Offenlegung von Vermögenswerten und der genehmigten Unterschrift erfahrener Anwälte hinsichtlich der Rechte, die eine voreheliche Ehe einräumt weg. Jeder sollte sich darüber im Klaren sein, dass die Eheschließung in 99 % der Fälle zugunsten der Person ausgeht, die sie ausarbeitet. Es schützt in erster Linie die Person, die bereits Eigentümer des Unternehmens, der Immobilie, des Wohnhauses usw. ist. Dazu können Renten, Ehegattenunterhalt usw. gehören.
Urbanette: Wie wäre es New York? Is it good to get married in The Empire State? What are the laws that couples should be particularly aware of (like no-fault cheating, prenup rules to follow, etc)?
Atty. Kelly: New York State is an Equitable Distribution state. The marital assets and debts of the parties (marital property) will be divided in an equitable fashion. This does not necessarily mean equal, however. What it does mean is that, based on the particular facts of the case, the assets and debts will be divided in a manner that fairly represents the party contributions to the marriage. For example, if assets were brought into the marriage, but have appreciated in value, the marital portion (the appreciation) would be subject to equitable distribution based on what contributions were made.
In no fault divorce a spouse can simply claim a marriage has broken down for at least six months before filing for divorce. Prior to New York’s adoption of no-fault divorce, a spouse was required to allege and prove, at trial, if necessary, grounds such as abandonment, adultery or cruel and inhuman treatment.
Advocates for victims of domestic violence have been won over by the no-fault law. They originally opposed it because they felt the history of abuse might not be factored into divorce settlements. But as it turned out, judges are much more likely to quickly award support and attorney fees that make it possible for women to leave an abusive home and get appropriate legal representation.
Though no fault streamlined the divorce process, the temporary support guidelines are messy. Some New York courts have ruled that New York’s no-fault divorce statute does not provide a defendant with a right to trial. In doing so, the court ruled that a party is not entitled to challenge the other spouse’s allegation that the marriage has broken down.
I suspect that more courts will adopt the position that New York’s no fault divorce law does not require a showing of marital wrongdoing. I think all that is necessary in order to make out a case for no fault divorce is a party’s sworn statement alleging that the marriage has indeed broken down.
Urbanette: You’ve been in the profession long enough to conclude that a great number of people are filing for divorce in January. When did this trend start?
Atty. Kelly: For at least thirty years of my practice I have seen a reoccurring trend that January has always been one of the busiest months. December has also been a busy month because you get many modifications of child access orders due to people wanting custody of children during the holidays.
Generally speaking, the advent of the New Year typically brings along New Year resolutions and a desire to start over and clean the slate. Too often than not, that includes ditching your spouse and starting anew either alone or in a new relationship.
There are also tax benefits to filing in January. By waiting the whole year, you can claim your spouse’s end of the year bonuses.
Urbanette: So is January the best time of the year to file for divorce? What makes it beneficial for filing for divorce in January?
Atty. Kelly: Again, there are specific tax advantages to filing in January. If you file for divorce in January, you should file your tax return in December while still married because it allows you to claim all of your spouse’s assets. January is the best time to divorce, that way you do not endure another year full of holidays with the significant other that you are trying to leave. It gives you a new lease on life being the fact that it’s a New Year.
Urbanette: Divorce is considered as the most difficult times in the lives of once happily married couples. How can a divorce process be considered “painless” and “beneficial” to all parties involved?
Atty. Kelly: The only divorces that are considered painless and beneficial are those where the people in general are in agreement on support, property division, child support, child sharing and child custody. Other than that it is unfortunately too often than not, a rather painful process for both parties. Divorce is used as either revenge, to inflict pain, attempt to financially destroy the other person, attempt to take away children, attempt to move to another state to cut the person out of their life.
There are of course exceptions, but often times divorce brings out the worst in people. My job is to help facilitate the process, and lessen the pain for everyone involved.
Urbanette: How can women protect themselves and their children during the divorce process?
Atty. Kelly: The best thing a woman can do for herself during a divorce is to get the right attorney. Check the attorney’s resume and make sure they practice what they preach. Do they write and or teach about the practice of family law? Are they on any legal and or divorce committees? They should be very well versed in the divorce process and the stator process. The practice of family law should be a deeply engrained aspect of their life. I also recommend going with a firm vs. a single attorney. A firm is usually better equipped to handle all challenges destined to arise given the volatile nature of divorce and litigation as well as the actual physiology and physical stress separating causes. A firm can instantly respond to a myriad of problems including violence, threatened violence, child abduction, confrontations, bank account draining etc. There is no way in this lifetime that a single practitioner can rapidly respond to all of these apprises.
Urbanette: Pre-nuptial agreement. What makes it a necessity these days?
Atty. Kelly: The reason prenuptial agreements is necessary these days is that there is still a 62% divorce rate.
Urbanette: Pre-nups versus perfect timing. Pre-nups forces the couple to talk about issues that may soon arise later in their married life (money management, estate planning, etc). The relationship may still be untested and talking about pre-nups can only make the couple stressful. Is there such a thing as “perfect timing” when it comes to pre-nups?
Atty. Kelly: There is an increase in certain hormones between six and eighteen months during a couple’s courtship and preparation into getting married. When that hormonal release stops, the couple had better have developed a decent companionship relationship to make it work out.
If the relationship is for real, and both parties care about each other they will be able to move forward in love and understand it’s for both parties protection. I suggest having the conversation sooner rather than later.
Urbanette: Are there cases when pre-nups can be fought (like signed while the woman is pregnant, etc.)?
Atty. Kelly: Some people cleverly get married and cause a child to be born in hopes it is going to be a long-term relationship. On the other side, the impregnating partner can think of it as a perfect way to get more control of their spouse. When there is an expectation of a great deal of money being left it should certainly be kept separate because their parents are attempting to leave assets to their children and are not usually contemplating those children having to share those assets with the spouse that they haven’t know for a very long period of time.
Urbanette: Do you have tips for making a fair and lasting pre-marital agreement?
Atty. Kelly: The main thing that prenups do is make sure that the person marrying is doing so for love and not the gain of money or love of money. If you have the money, prepare a pre-nuptial. If you do not have the money, check and request because there is a time the pre-nup will stop being an order.
Atty. Michael Kelly is a frequent contributor to Sirius XM Radio, CBS Radio, The Huffington Post, as well as numerous NBC, ABC, CBS, FOX, and CW network affiliates. The Law Offices of Michael Kelly are located in Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, and Century City, CA. For more information, visit www.cfli.com.
Angela Schmidt
Marriage is known as the joining of two families and a new start of the life of the newly married person. Divorce is known as the separation of the two persons that are in a living relationship but after the divorce, they separated from each other. Prenups are the life that held before marriage.
Naomi Vickers
This one’s a gem. I tell you girls, bookmark or save this one. I’ve been in a divorce, and it’s the hardest and the most painful experience I ever had so far. I thought prenups are unnecessary, but I learned the hard way. To girls out there, be mentally and emotionally prepared before getting yourself into this crazy kind of mess. Be prepared even in the most minute details so you won’t regret any decisions you make.
Jamar Edwards
“What therefore God hath joined together, let no man put asunder.” It is the most basic and honorable rule my mother taught me about getting married. Yet people are so eager to separate with only a simple matter like money problems or in-laws. Say what!? Why did you get married in the first place!?
Ocean Bickley
I remembered the movie, Mrs. Doubtfire. It’s hilarious, but it shows how divorce and separation can affect the family, especially the children. It also tells us what someone might or could do to the extreme if he/she doesn’t completely get over with his/her separation.
Rachelle Smith
Are prenup agreements really necessary? I think it is just a waste of time and resources on both sides. It’s like planning the divorce before planning the marriage, and it may cause friction in a relationship.
Jennifer Hartmann
In reality, it is us women, who usually suffer the most after a divorce. It affects our emotional well-being profoundly, and we often find our mind in a chaotic state. This article indeed helps us to prepare for such an unfortunate event. The divorce, of course, not the marriage.
Blaise Dalton
Man, from this article I can say marriage (and divorce, for that matter) is quite difficult. Those prenups are used by some for their advancement and not to maintain their sacred vows. I just hope I don’t get to experience that if ever I am going to get married. To the girls I am dating (girls? oh no…) I hope you are also reading this.
Michelle Norris
I am a lawyer yes, but not for divorce. Though someone I know said it was desensitizing and very challenging. He often advises his client when to disarm or back-down, and saw how many ignored that advice. It might be counterintuitive, but he said he watched good people making mistakes that last a lifetime. I think it is good I don’t get to do that?
Anna Hendrickson
I appreciate this article though it makes me sad that married couples have to go through this painful part in their life where it is not worth it to save their marriage. I know how to be alone, and it is hard to explain to my child our situation sometimes. I fear that it has some effect on her.
Stephanie Craig
Don’t get married if you are only thinking of getting a divorce in the end! What are you, some changeable-minded freak!? You’re all lovey-dovey in the beginning then, one wrong move from your partner and you threaten to leave!? Come on…